Tennis
I went to bed at midnight last night. Took a peek before doing so at the Murray/Djokovic quarterfinals match. As of midnight, they'd played two sets; each winning one. Each of which, it should be noted, took over an hour to complete according to the graphic I read. This projects to roughly 3:00 am as the finishing time if they go five sets.
Men's tennis is stupid enough already, but who thought this was a good idea?
And while we're on it? The reason men's tennis is stupid is that the game has evolved over the years from a serve and volley style in which a given point was decided in three, four, five shots to, essentially, a higher powered version of the women's base-line game in which rallies frequently last 15-20 shots. Which is fine for three sets, but way too time-consuming for five. Stupid, in fact.
I can't think of a worse sports/entertainment return on time invested than a 5-set men's tennis match. And I kind of like tennis.
Men's tennis is stupid enough already, but who thought this was a good idea?
And while we're on it? The reason men's tennis is stupid is that the game has evolved over the years from a serve and volley style in which a given point was decided in three, four, five shots to, essentially, a higher powered version of the women's base-line game in which rallies frequently last 15-20 shots. Which is fine for three sets, but way too time-consuming for five. Stupid, in fact.
I can't think of a worse sports/entertainment return on time invested than a 5-set men's tennis match. And I kind of like tennis.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home